1. Value-judgement

Mixed.

  • NOT value-judgement when describing mechanistic properties of a (biomedical) system.
  • Value-judgement when describing programs, communities, networks, teams, etc. (often removable without changing core meaning).
Examples
  • Cognitive function relies on the cohesive activity of large-scale networks. (NOT HYPE)

  • We have assembled a cohesive team to carry out the proposed work. (HYPE)


2. Hyperbolic

Not inherently hyperbolic.

Examples

NA


3. Gratuitous

Often gratuitous when used for programs/communities/teams and grounds are not given (no operationalization/evidence; no “because …”; no stated criteria for cohesion).
Often modifies: group, program, research, unit, training, team, center, community, environment, framework, effort, plan.

Examples
  • We have assembled a cohesive team to carry out the proposed work. (HYPE)

4. Amplified

Sometimes amplified (e.g., highly, very).

Examples
  • We have built a highly cohesive program to support trainees. (HYPE)

5. Coordinated

Sometimes coordinated/stacked with other positive descriptors (e.g., collaborative, integrated, productive).

Examples
  • …a cohesive and collaborative training program … (HYPE)

6. Broader context

When ambiguous, consider whether surrounding context contributes to or detracts from overall promotional force (e.g., stacking vs. explicit grounds).

Examples
  • The MCC ?s collective efforts also draw on strong institutional training resources to achieve 2 overarching goals of this program : to guide cohesive growth and coordinate transdisciplinary education and mentoring endeavors across the MCC ; and to integrate with other efforts campus wide . (HYPE)

⬅ Back to Rigor


This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.